The flow to obtain Vinet equation of state is as follows:
Rose et al. [1983] proposed that the binding energy of metals can be well approximated by the following function:
(1)
where a is reduction of the atomic spacing:
(2)
where r0 and r are the interatomic distances at zero and high pressures, and l is the scaling length. Based on this relation, F of a matter of interest can be expressed as:
(3)
where F0 is a constant.
By expressing Eq. (3) by the volumes at zero and high pressures, V0 and V as:
(4)
(5)
By substituting Eqs. (4) and (5) into Eq. (3), we have:
(6)
Therefore, P is:
(7)
By differentiating Eq. (7) by V at constant T, we have:
(8)
From Eq. (8), KT is:
(9)
The KT0 is obtained by substituting V = V0 to Eq. (9):
(10)
KT' is obtained by dividing the V derivative of KT by the V derivative of P.
(11)
The V derivative of KT is:
(12)
By substituting Eqs. (12) and (8) into Eq. (11), we have:
(13)
KT' at zero P (KT0') is obtained by substituting V = V0 into Eq. (13).
(14)
From Eq. (7) with Eqs. (10) and (14), we have:
(15)
Finally, we have the Vinet equation of state:
(16)
Thus, the mathematical derivation of the Vinet equation of state is clear from the assumption of the formula of F. Although Rose et al. [1983] proposed the potential (Eq. 1) based on metal data, Vinet et al. [1987] confirmed validity of the equation of state (Eq. 16) by various material such as H2, D2, Xe, Rb, Mo, NaCl, MgO, magnetite and so on.